• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

International Anti Corruption Resource Center

Washington DC

  • What We Do
  • Strategy
  • Courses
  • NGO Initiative
  • Resources
  • Posts
  • Team
  • Contribute

GovTech and Procurement Fraud

W. Michael Kramer | September 17, 2020

More and more procurement is now being conducted through electronic procurement systems that collect and store masses of digital data.  This data can be used to support the installation of automated, proactive fraud detection systems (known as “Fraud Filters” or “Integrity Filters”) that can identify and block potentially fraudulent transactions before losses are incurred – an obvious and enormous advantage.

More specifically, the Integrity Filters can :

  • Instantly review 100 percent of all transactions, rather than limited samples as in standard audits
  • Block non-compliant or improper procurement transactions, such as bids from companies on ineligible lists, bids received after the bid deadline or other improper transactions
  • Provide instant alerts of possible fraud, prioritized by importance and level of risk
  • Permit detailed, real-time remote monitoring by oversight agencies, which is not currently feasible in paper procurement transactions
  • Create detailed audit trails and digital evidence for auditors and investigators

The Filters can identify the red flags of a number of procurement fraud and abuse schemes, including:

  • Collusive bidding
  • Bid rigging
  • Kickbacks
  • Conflicts of interest
  • False, inflated and duplicate invoices
  • Shell companies
  • Phantom vendors
  • Purchases for personal use or resale

See more info on the red flags and detection methods of the above schemes at Integrity Filters.

In addition to detecting potential fraud, the Filters can generate other reports, such as:

  • Significant procurement statistics
    • e.g., the number of contracts awarded to certain contractors by certain approving officials
  • Economy and efficiency indicators
    • e.g., the selection of the best product for best price, or the failure to do so
  • Compliance reports
    • e.g., contracts in violation of procurement rules, such as too short notice to submit bids, bids from a debarred company, sole source contracts above the sole source limit, etc.
  • “SPQQD” reports
    • Selection, Price, Quantity, Quality and Delivery indicators that can point to fraud or abuse

To effectively utilize the Filters, eProcurement systems should:

  • In tender transactions, collect all winning and losing bids and related data in a structured, electronic format readable by the fraud detection algorithms. This could be accomplished by requiring the bidders to download and populate standard bidding templates with predefined fields.  The bid forms should include line item detail and prices when called for.
  • In purchasing frauds, collect the full array of purchasing records – purchase orders, receiving, invoicing and payment information – rather than just purchase orders or receiving documents, as many current eProcurement systems do. Invoice and payment information is necessary to detect and prevent most purchasing frauds.
  • An alternative would be to link e-Procurement to an ERP system (such as SAP) or other expense management and payment apps.  This would allow the easy integration of the necessary invoicing and payment records with procurement documents.

See more information on the advantages of eProcurement and Integrity Filters at pages 29-42 and ANNEX A in GovTech and Fraud Detection in Public Administration.  The full paper discusses the most promising application of digital anti-fraud measures in procurement, financial  management systems and HR systems.

Filed Under: Fraud & Corruption

Primary Sidebar

SEARCH 

RECENT POSTS

  • GovTech and Procurement Fraud
  • Combating Fraud in Difficult Times and Places
  • Its time for NGOs to talk about fraud…
  • Introducing “DevWin” Helping NGOs Better Address Fraud Risks
  • IACRC Presents Training on Investigating Construction Fraud
  • Training Workshop for Egypt’s Administrative Control Agency
  • Corruption and Climate Change
  • IACRC Briefs Chinese Delegations on Anti-Corruption Issues
  • IACRC’s Michael Kramer Participates in Indonesia Anti-Corruption Conference
  • IACRC Participates in CEELI Institute Program

ARCHIVES

Footer

IACRC:  International Anti-Corruption Resource Center

1900 M Street NW, 4th Floor
Washington, D.C. 20036
Thomas C. Green, President
tcgreen@iacrc.org

News & Noteworthy

GovTech and Procurement Fraud

Combating Fraud in Difficult Times and Places

© 2021 International Anti Corruption Resource Center • All Rights Reserved